Global Strategy & M&A Legal Advisory Unit, Accenture

Strategic legal intervention in a high-stakes international acquisition.

About

Stabilizing a High-Value Acquisition

During the final phase of a $600M cross-border acquisition, Accenture’s internal Strategy & M&A Legal Advisory Unit encountered critical contractual disputes between European and Southeast Asian stakeholders. Conflicting interpretations of liability, post-acquisition obligations, and data governance regulations stalled the transaction and threatened to undermine investor confidence. Keen Lex International was engaged to realign contractual terms, mediate disputes, and secure regulatory compliance in all affected jurisdictions.

We conducted a comprehensive legal review of all transaction documents, facilitated structured negotiations between stakeholders, and developed a unified compliance roadmap. Through rapid intervention, we successfully restructured the acquisition agreement, resolved disputes, and ensured adherence to EU, Singaporean, and U.S. regulatory frameworks. The acquisition was finalized within the original timeline with no material financial penalties or reputational damage.

Problem

Contractual Misalignment

Divergent legal interpretations across jurisdictions caused transaction delays and increased legal exposure.

Goal

Finalize Acquisition Without Delay

The client sought to resolve disputes swiftly and maintain investor confidence without renegotiating the full purchase structure.

Solution

Mediation & Strategic Contract Reframing

We led targeted negotiations, revised key liability clauses, and implemented legally compliant solutions acceptable to all parties.

Their precision, neutrality, and ability to navigate multiple legal systems helped us finalize a deal that nearly collapsed.

Coordinated Resolution Framework

To resolve the dispute, we executed a multi-level intervention model combining legal reconciliation, inter-stakeholder diplomacy, and cross-border compliance mapping. Our structured process ensured alignment without jeopardizing financial timelines or stakeholder trust.

Phase 1

Assessment & Analysis

We initiated the process with a full legal and transactional diagnostic to understand the source of dispute and jurisdictional conflicts. This involved evaluating all contract clauses, regulatory implications, and financial liabilities to create a precise map of legal risks.


  • Reviewed acquisition agreements and liability clauses

  • Identified conflicting contractual interpretations

  • Mapped legal obligations in EU, Singapore, and U.S. markets

  • Assessed regulatory risks under GDPR, PDPA, and SEC rules

Phase 2

Assessment & Analysis

Strategic Planning

Strategic Planning

We initiated the process with a full legal and transactional diagnostic to understand the source of dispute and jurisdictional conflicts. This involved evaluating all contract clauses, regulatory implications, and financial liabilities to create a precise map of legal risks.


  • Reviewed acquisition agreements and liability clauses

  • Identified conflicting contractual interpretations

  • Mapped legal obligations in EU, Singapore, and U.S. markets

  • Assessed regulatory risks under GDPR, PDPA, and SEC rules

With core issues defined, we developed a strategy to realign stakeholders and restructure contractual language without renegotiating the full acquisition. The plan focused on legally acceptable compromises, jurisdictional clarity, and maintaining investor confidence.


  • Defined non-negotiable terms for each jurisdiction

  • Crafted revised contract language for disputed sections

  • Built a neutral facilitation framework for executive-level dialogues

  • Established regulatory and compliance safeguards

With core issues defined, we developed a strategy to realign stakeholders and restructure contractual language without renegotiating the full acquisition. The plan focused on legally acceptable compromises, jurisdictional clarity, and maintaining investor confidence.


  • Defined non-negotiable terms for each jurisdiction

  • Crafted revised contract language for disputed sections

  • Built a neutral facilitation framework for executive-level dialogues

  • Established regulatory and compliance safeguards

Phase 3

Assessment & Analysis

Implementation

Implementation

We initiated the process with a full legal and transactional diagnostic to understand the source of dispute and jurisdictional conflicts. This involved evaluating all contract clauses, regulatory implications, and financial liabilities to create a precise map of legal risks.


  • Reviewed acquisition agreements and liability clauses

  • Identified conflicting contractual interpretations

  • Mapped legal obligations in EU, Singapore, and U.S. markets

  • Assessed regulatory risks under GDPR, PDPA, and SEC rules

Following approval of the strategy, we executed legal and negotiation actions to finalize the acquisition. This included mediating between parties, formalizing revised agreements, ensuring compliance submissions, and overseeing the final closing process.


  • Conducted multi-party mediated negotiations

  • Finalized amendments to liability, indemnity, and data clauses

  • Submitted regulatory compliance filings

  • Monitored implementation until transaction close

Following approval of the strategy, we executed legal and negotiation actions to finalize the acquisition. This included mediating between parties, formalizing revised agreements, ensuring compliance submissions, and overseeing the final closing process.


  • Conducted multi-party mediated negotiations

  • Finalized amendments to liability, indemnity, and data clauses

  • Submitted regulatory compliance filings

  • Monitored implementation until transaction close

Result

Acquisition Secured, Legal Risks Neutralized

The disputed acquisition successfully closed on schedule, avoiding financial penalties, regulatory delays, and public disclosure of internal conflict. All parties formally agreed to amended contractual terms, preserving strategic relationships and enabling seamless transition across corporate entities. Internal stakeholders reported heightened confidence in deal stability and legal governance.

A regulatory-compliant structure was put in place to guide future acquisitions, including updated contract templates, jurisdiction-specific legal guidelines, and a conflict-prevention protocol for cross-border transactions. This case underscores Keen Lex International’s capability to step into complex, high-pressure negotiations, restore alignment among global stakeholders, and secure business objectives without operational disruption.

Contact

Contact

Contact